Skip to main content
External SSDs

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page. Prices and availability are subject to change. We are reader-supported and independent — our rankings are based on an objective scoring rubric, not sponsorship.

Seagate FireCuda External USB-C vs Silicon Power PC60 1TB

Compare Seagate FireCuda External USB-C and Silicon Power PC60 1TB side by side. Both are 2TB USB 3.2 Gen 2 external SSDs, but they differ in speed, design, and value. Here's how they stack up.

Our Pick

Seagate

Seagate FireCuda External USB-C
8.8/10

Purpose-built for gamers with RGB lighting and fast load times for console and PC.

RGB lighting customizable via software
Fast load times for console and PC
USB-C connectivity
Check on Amazon →

Silicon Power

Silicon Power PC60 1TB
7.3/10

A budget 1050-class Gen 2 portable from Silicon Power — one of the cheapest brand-name 1TB Gen 2 SSDs at retail. Plastic body, gray aesthetic, no IP rating. Real value is cost-per-TB, not build or sustained performance.

1000 MB/s read
Budget pricing
Compact form factor
Check on Amazon →

Spec Comparison

Spec
Seagate FireCuda External USB-C
Silicon Power PC60 1TB
Read Speed
1.0 GB/s ✓
1.0 GB/s
Write Speed
1.0 GB/s ✓
900 MB/s
Capacity
2 TB ✓
1 TB
Interface
USB 3.2 Gen 2
USB 3.2 Gen 2
Endurance (TBW)
700 TB ✓
600 TB
Warranty
3 Years
3 Years
Score
8.8/10 ✓
7.3/10
Total Wins
5 wins
0 wins

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Seagate FireCuda External USB-C or Silicon Power PC60 1TB?
The Seagate FireCuda External USB-C scores 8.8/10 compared to 7.3/10 for the Silicon Power PC60 1TB. Our expert analysis favors the Seagate FireCuda External USB-C for its superior speed.
What's the difference between Seagate FireCuda External USB-C and Silicon Power PC60 1TB?
The key differences: The Seagate FireCuda External USB-C offers 1,030 MB/s reads vs 1,000 MB/s for the Silicon Power PC60 1TB. Capacity options differ: Seagate FireCuda External USB-C is 2TB while Silicon Power PC60 1TB is 1TB. The Seagate FireCuda External USB-C uses USB 3.2 Gen 2 while the Silicon Power PC60 1TB uses USB 3.2 Gen 2.
Which is faster, Seagate FireCuda External USB-C or Silicon Power PC60 1TB?
The Seagate FireCuda External USB-C is faster with 1,030 MB/s read speeds compared to 1,000 MB/s for the Silicon Power PC60 1TB. That's a 3% speed advantage.
Which has better value, Seagate FireCuda External USB-C or Silicon Power PC60 1TB?
The Seagate FireCuda External USB-C scores higher (8.8 vs 7.3/10), indicating better overall value in our evaluation. Check both models on the retailer's site for the latest details.

More Comparisons

Seagate FireCuda External USB-C vs Samsung T9 2TB → Silicon Power PC60 1TB vs Samsung T9 2TB →
Seagate FireCuda External USB-C vs Samsung T9 Portable SSD → Silicon Power PC60 1TB vs Samsung T9 Portable SSD →
Seagate FireCuda External USB-C vs Crucial X10 Pro 2TB → Silicon Power PC60 1TB vs Crucial X10 Pro 2TB →
Seagate FireCuda External USB-C vs Samsung T7 4TB → Silicon Power PC60 1TB vs Samsung T7 4TB →